Ps5 vs Xbox Scarlett difference?

From the specified technical data, the new Xbox Scarlett will be better than the PS5.

Will the difference in gambling be very serious or will a normal mortal hardly notice it?

Personally, I always switch between Xbox and Playstadion, now the PS would be my turn.

But if the difference is really that big then I'll consider getting an Xbox again.

I would take the PS5

How the difference is when playing, nobody knows yet, because it has not been tested! But reach for the PS5, because you are on the safe side when it comes to performance

Just wait. It all depends on the developers.

And for what reason?

The difference between the PS4 Pro and the Xbox One X was much larger in comparison and there were virtually no differences at all. To assume that the differences will be "even" clearer (or even enormous) this time is just absurd. Quite apart from that, the PS5 is only weaker in two areas (texture fill rate and teraflops,). In ALL others it is stronger according to the official published specs. 😂

The hardware would still have to be fully exhausted, which we're still a long way from. Since third party manufacturers do not tailor their products to the respective consoles, you will only notice differences in first party games anyway. And Microsoft is rather modest in this regard. 😄 (The presentation of Halo Infinite also went quite bad when I think about the popups etc. 🙈).

To present a few numbers. The respective differences highlighted, divided into PS4 Pro vs. XOX and PS5 vs. XSX. The value is always behind the console that performed better.

-

CPU

Pro - 2.1GHz

XOX - 2.3GHz (9% difference)

PS5 - 8 core 16 threads 3.5GHz

XSX - 8 core 16 threads 3.6GHz (2.6% difference)

GPU teraflop

Pro - 2304 x .900 x 2 = 4.2TF

XOX - 2560 x 1,172 x 2 = 6TF (40% difference)

PS5 = 10.28TF

XSX = 12TF (15% difference)

RAM / bandwidth

Per 8GB at 217.6 GB / s

XOX 12GB at 326.4 GB / s (40% difference)

PS5 = 16GB @ 448GB / s

(22% difference vs 6GB)

XSX = 10GB @ 560GB / s and 6GB @ 336GB / s

(22% difference for 10GB)

Triangle rasterization

Per 4 X .900 = 3.6 trillion triangles / s

XOX 4 X 1.172 = 4.7 Billion triangle / s (26% for XOX)

PS5 - 4 x 2.23 = 8.92 BT / s (20% difference)

XSX - 4 x 1,825 = 7.3 BT / s

Culling rate

Per 8 X .900 = 7.2 BT / s

XOX 8 X 1.172 = 9.2BT / s (24% difference)

PS5 - 8 x 2.23 GHz = 17.84 BT / s (20% difference)

XSX - 8 x 1.825 GHz = 14.6 BT / s

Pixel fill rate

Per 64 x .900 = 58 GPixel / s (41% difference)

XOX 32 X 1,172 = 38 GPixel / s

PS5 - 64 x 2.23 - 142.72 GPixel / s (20% difference)

XSX - 64 x 1,825 - 116.8 GPixel / s

Texture fill rate

Per 144 X .900 = 130 GTexel / s

XOX 160 X 1.172 = 188 GTexel / s (36% difference)

PS5 - 4 x 36 x 2.23 = 321.12 GTexel / s

XSX - 4 x 52 x 1,825 = 379.6 GTexel / s (16% difference)

So the Xbox One X was a lot stronger than the PS4 Pro. The difference that made in this generation is well known. 😄 And now everything changes because the XSX is slightly stronger in 2-3 specs? All wishful thinking…

He's a typical playstation fanboy

The xbox is better

He doesn't know I would take an xbox, have a ps4 just because of the game pass and xbox live (online service) should be free

Me or the questioner? Then I'm the one whose last PlayStation was the PS1 and who has had all Xbox generations since. 😂