Is it worth buying a pc with a budget of 3000 euro or more just to get a little more power than the Ps5 for 450 - 600 euro?

And exclusive titles like Spiderman with 4k 60fps will look better than most PC games anyway.

Xbox can be forgotten, because there are no good games for me to keep up with horizon, gt, ratchet and clank etc.

You don't need to buy a 300 Euro PC, for most games in 4k a 1200-1400 Euro PC is enough

You just have an incredibly much wider range of games on the PC and you can also gradually upgrade the PC when it is no longer up to date. The PS5 is outdated at some point and then it stands around or is sold and the next generation comes.

For a budget of 3K you get a PC with significantly more power than the PS5

But consoles are still cheaper and the parts that I would have to replace would not be that cheap to improve the PC.

What kind of games are there that can keep up with Spiderman miles morales, horizon 2 forbidden west, ratchet and clank, gran turismo 7, ethia, kena, etc?

Because you can get a PC with an RTX 2080ti, a Ryzen 3700x, 16 GB RAM and a very fast M.2 SSD for 2,000 € and that's pretty much the maximum that you can buy acutely for a gaming PC. Everything you buy for the remaining € 1,000 is irrelevant for gaming.

If you only want to gamble, a console is actually the better choice from the P / L ratio. In addition, there are always exclusive titles.

On the other hand, there are many more games for PCs.

Six times to get a little more power?

Exclusive titles still look better because the performance of the Ps5 is fully used.

🎁0

A.) I don't know any of the games - I'm not a gamer

b.) determined quite a few in a few months

The game world is so fast paced. Anyway, my husband is a die-hard gamer and I don't think there's anyone in his community who would prefer Playstation to PC. We have both… And playstations from tens of generations of XD. But actually he plays 95% on the PC.

And yes… Upgrading is obviously expensive. But I don't think that's the number one criterion for many gamers. It doesn't seem very rational to me what they all buy new, just so that the "graphics look even better". Always laughed at when I say that I see no difference. ^^ "

But for me there's no difference between HD and normal television…

A console is an all-round package and will become obsolete in 5 years. On a 3K PC, you can play current titles even longer. In my opinion, the only advantage of consoles is the exclusive titles

1.) I like your name

2.) With the PC you can also play online for free. Really makes me think.

If so, it would not be worth it. The performance increase between a 1500 Euro PC and a 3000 Euro PC is not worth the surcharge. That applies in general.

The new consoles will not be that blatant. Yes, they will be significantly more competent than the current generation when their release was.

However, there are also new graphics cards for this year that should be significantly faster than the current generation. For comparison: Everything we know about the Ps5 indicates that it will be about as fast as a PC with an NVidia RTX 2080. That is decent and if you consider the optimization that is possible on consoles, it is also a real house number for 600 euro.

However, there are just as many assumptions that the new cards from NVidia put a good deal on it again. Accordingly, the Zen3 would be faster again next year at the latest, and not for 3000 but for 1000 euro.

I don't think that the really blatant SSD on the Playstation will make a significant difference to its PC colleagues in the foreseeable future.

The next is: why are consoles so cheap? Sony and Microsoft also want to make money. They get the money back with surcharges on games, DLCs and in-game purchases. With this you also pay a lot more for the console than you think at the beginning.

However, exclusive titles are by no means as groundbreaking as you describe. Yes, they always looked good, but they usually don't set new standards in terms of graphics or anything.