As soon as Christmas is coming again and I do not really know what to get I've thought about buying a wireless headset but nik I undecided which it should be either the Steelseries Arctis pro Wireless (269 Euro) or the Astro A50 Gen4 (Ps4 Version 229 Euro Xbox version 249 Euro), I would use it mainly on the PC, sometimes also on Ps4 or Xbox to Gamen and use and for other things, since I can't decide and also does not know which of these is better or if vllt one completely different headset comes into question, I do not know. Therefore, I hope for helpful answers or consultations.
(PS: currently have the Hyperx Cloud Alpha)
Also I know that this is not the answer to the question, but I would recommend you if you play fps or in itself first person games you prefer to buy a 144hz monitor. Of course you have to make sure that your hardware packs at least a constant 100 fps minimum. From 60 to 144hz is really a big jump and wireless headsets I find jz for the price not worth the cable bothers me (at least) anyway hardly. And if you really want to spend 250 euro just for the fact that the cable does not bother? Anyway, the 144 hz monitor does not cost much, so I can link it to you, it's also a bit curved.
Ehm first thanks for the answer, however, I already own a 144 Hz monitor and therefore need no
Also I know that this is not the answer to the question, but I would recommend you if you play fps or in itself first person games you prefer to buy a 144hz monitor.
at the moment, it's only worth it for the PC. Neither the PS4 nor the XBox in the current generation pack more than 30fps, unless you change them to "high perfomance" or something like that, where the graphics gets worse and more FPS comes about, the good old 60fps.
Of course you have to make sure that your hardware packs at least a constant 100 fps minimum
Well with a 144hz monitor, it should then be constant 144 fps, there are clear drops but should still be sufficiently high.
From 60 to 144hz is really a big jump
the power is still reserved for the PC.
Nice meant, but you can't even reach the 144hz rudimentary, so seen money thrown out of the window.
Sry but I do not know what degree you criticized my answer. That it is worthwhile only for pc is clear, the questioner has so synonymous one. And I own a 144hz monitor and 60 hz 100 fps / 144hz 100 fps is still a big difference
Oh lol, then I completely over-read the part with the PC. Because I thought the whole time that would be for the console. Sry. [] ~ (¯ ▽ ¯) ~ *
Is it true that there's still a big difference between 60 and 100. Nevertheless, it would be worthwhile only if the hardware can offer this to at least 90%. Probably does not bring anything if this only comes to 100 at the beginning of the game and decreases over time, because the computer is running warm.
I do not know how many times this question should be asked, but wireless gaming headsets are a nice and funny gimmick, but none that I can really take seriously. Brings more disadvantages than advantages. If you really want a clever upgrade to your old system (the HyperX), I would recommend a mix of lavalier microphone and studio headphone, so you do not even have to invest 30 euro and have the sound of the headphones and the microphone just more of.
Well, if the computer is warm, the fps probably rise rather you weebaou xD
