The One S is the more compact One, with quieter fans and 4k support the X is significantly faster, but also costs 3 times as much
The Xbox One S is a successor console of the Xbox One with approximately the same performance only in smaller, that's why the S.
The Xbox One X is also an improved version of the Xbox One and has significantly more power than the One / One S and can also display games in 4k and it is significantly quieter.
Hope could help you.
The One S only supports 4K when playing Blu Ray but not when playing games.
4k is also supported in games, but the normal one could too
As another user wrote, the One S is only a scaled-down model of the original One. With the difference that the One S also supports HDR and also has a 4k player with which you can play 4k Blu-rays.
The One X also supports HDR and also native, i.e. Real 4k gameplay in games, in contrast to the One S, which has to be limited to films and ingame sequences due to its weaker performance. Due to the better hardware, it also offers other advantages, which vary depending on the game. These include higher foresight, higher and more stable frame rates, better light effects or faster reloading of textures. Different performance modes can also be set in many games. Either better graphics or smooth 60 frames. It is also very quiet, but for the reasons mentioned, it is also somewhat more expensive.
A prerequisite for getting the most out of a One X is a reasonable 4K, HDR television.
It's not true.
4k couldn't do the original One at all. The One S is limited to playing 4k Blu-rays or pre-made ingame sequences. It can also scale up to 4k in-game.
Only the One X can do real native 4k.
Yes, even the X can't do a real 4k, of course everything is scaled up, otherwise it would hardly be possible
If you think so.
I owned all of them and also a PS4 pro. This also scales up. At World of Tanks I have a direct comparison. Believe me there are worlds in between.
By the way, my TV is a Samsung Q7.
Yes, of course, but you get a good 4k for 500 euro, you have to invest more
"otherwise it would hardly be possible", what do you think why the One X costs more?
Because better hardware makes it possible. But yes, you also scaled the One X right, depending on the frame rate down from native 4k.
The One S, on the other hand, scales up from full HD.
Yes, but for 500 euro you can't expect real 4k gaming, just a graphics card that is suitable for it costs at least 400
Oh what a discussion. You are probably not a console player because then you would know that it is possible for 500 euro. After all, at 4k most games are lured to 30 frames, but not all but many. This saves performance.
I recommend doing some internet research on the theme, otherwise I refer to my other comment.
I had some consoles myself, but 30 fps not with me.
Do you not understand me or am I writing too complicated.
The One X offers real native 4k and no other console can do that.
Whether in every situation and with how many frames is not the issue here.
Also, one should not always make the mistake of comparing the price of a graphics card of which there are many, as well as the different hardware configurations of a PC with the graphics chip of a console, which is a mass product.
Oh, that's fine. As an example, at Horizon I can choose between performance 60 FPS or graphics 4k with 30 FPS. The difference seems minimal to me and I prefer to play in nice with real-time lighting at 30. However, both frame rates are stable throughout.
Gears 5, on the other hand, offers both. 4k and 60 frames in one. In contrast to the predecessor, where you also had to decide, there was a huge difference.
I think the Konsoleros as far as high frame rates are concerned, especially since more than 60 are not so technically awesome. The main thing is that it runs stably without slumps.
Yes well I usually take the medium with 144fps and wqhd, 4k 144 is really too expensive for me at the moment
Funnily enough, the One X supports 120Hz, which is obsolete at frame rates of 60.
As far as technology is concerned, I'm absolutely satisfied with the combination of One X and TV.
4k and 120 should be possible on the successor Series X which I also believe.
Tv is difficult at 144hz and input lag is also rather moderate, my computer has been around for a few years, but wqhd is not a problem
Well my TV supports like the One Feesync. In game mode, the input lag is about 9ms.
No one notices that.
It shouldn't be much lower on a decent computer at 4k and 60 FPS plus.
But doubt that a TV can get to the input lag of a Tn panel
