Can the Xbox Series S play 4k at 30fps like the XboxSeriesX and Ps5?
No! The Series S is designed for a resolution of 1440p, but with 60 or even 120fps (depending on the game).
πWhere do you want to know that the Xbox Series S can't play 4K at 30fps / 60fps?
Ok, wrongly expressed: No "native" 4K, but 1440p upscaled for use on 4K televisions. At least that's how MS communicated it to my knowledge.
I would be happy if I'm wrong, after all, the S will be my office console!
Exactly no native 4K π. I wanted to hear that.
However, the console will be capable of upscaling 4K with 120fps, since it also manages 1440p with 120fps and the upscaling does not require a lot of computing power
Yes, I think the "little one" is absolutely impressive, especially for the price. MS primarily focuses on high FPS rates, which suits me as a shooter and occasionally racing game player.
No, they said that a maximum of 1440p is supported
Quote: The main difference between Xbox Series X and Xbox Series S is in the resolution. From the feedback from the community, Team Xbox has learned that the refresh rate is more important to gamers than the resolution. For this reason, the Xbox Series S was designed to be a console that doesn't require a 4K TV. Xbox Series S offers three times the GPU performance of the Xbox One and is designed for games with a resolution of 1440p at 60 frames per second. The support ranges up to 120 frames per second.
That's all well and good, but as seen in the trailer, the Xbox Series S can also play 4K games and films. The first, however, only upscaled - which is not particularly bad, since the competition is also mainly out for upscaling and tricks.
πThe Series S is for people who want a next gen console for a low price.
Well 300 euro for no real 4K no drive that is even partly better than the one x because you can save 2 months longer and then get the x
You don't need real 4K if you want to play in 1080p or so.
A drive is completely unnecessary in 2020 in my opinion.
The Xbox One X is no better than the Series S - the games run better and better on the S - but in a lower resolution.
A drive is not unnecessary because CD's still require less memory than the games from the store
πππ€¦πΌβοΈ.
You can see that you have no idea.
CD's only save the games in compressed form. The game itself is installed on the console, the CD only serves as a key to play the game.
So your thesis bull is' '' hit
I have no idea? You first grab your own nose before you pack on to others. And you can tell that too. The game if you buy it on CD then the game is on the CD because you only need to put in a cod and then that is
And if it is already on the console then you would not have any more memory, let alone then you would not have to download anything π€£
I meant that completely different.
ON the CD is the installation file, which you open on the respective device, then you install the data and can play the game as long as the CD is inside.
The game itself does not run on the CD but on the hard drive.
would it be on the CD the game would run worse than on a normal HDD
Then explain it this way and not another π€¦π»βοΈ
Nevertheless, a CD requires less memory than games from the store, since you only have to download the file and not the entire game
Why shouldn't you be able to or have to download the complete game?
Additional data is still drawn from the Internet. Therefore an internet connection is often required when downloading a CD game
