Where did the 12,155 teraflops of the XboxSeriesX go?
Unfortunately, the Ps5 has a better gaming performance than the XboxSeriesX and this has been proven by Digital Foundry itself with tests.
Both are confirmed to run at dynamic 4k and have no difference in image quality.
Unfortunately, the Ps5 has better frame rates at important points, while the XboxSeriesX unfortunately drops to 40-50fps.
The Ps5 also has better loading times:
Digital Foundry unfortunately said that the Ps5 asked for the better gaming performance from the two and that gives me a headache.
I actually wanted the Xbox SeriesX to run better, too bad.
But why does the XboxSeriesX run worse with 12.155 teraflops and rdna 2 than the Ps5 with 9-10.3 teraflops overclocked without rdna 2.
People always told me that the Xbox SeriesX is stronger.
Especially after the launch of the XboxSeriesX it was noticed that nobody talks about it anymore, except for errors that also occur with the Ps5, but the XboxSeriesX really doesn't have anything new where you can say "wow".
At Playstation we have the Dualsense Controller, the good games, the better loading times, let's see what games will come out for the Ps5 in 2021 alone. I think that's a shame.
The link to the video from DF:
Oh god, how stupid you can be. It doesn't matter what is better where or how or which tf this and that is the main thing you have fun…
And that the PS5 has better loading times, I'm not really surprised…
Roof tiles, that's important.
The XboxSeriesX has to be better or not? It has 12,155 teraflops and the Ps5 only has 9 teraflops, that's almost 40%
Why is that?
It's like installing a Golf engine in a 40 tonne truck and then wondering why the net drives so fast
Just because you have performance doesn't mean that the one is better…
It depends on what the developer can get out of the hardware
Oh hi? Didn't you want to erase yourself? Everything's fine?
As always, you are well informed and drawing the wrong conclusions.
That's because you consider a game test to be representative of the performance of an entire console - this is your mistake. It is not clear what exactly this depends on, cpu? GPU? Manufacturer? Programmer? Etc. Pp -
In general, I'm now that you can actually see something of the performance of the two consoles and not just pseudo demos - then both are more than disappointing for me. Despite dynamic resolution frame drops on both consoles, screen tearing on both consoles, no 4k on both consoles, graphics quality is not impressive. I wrote you a lengthy text about the Demon Souls trailer - unfortunately that turned out to be true - the finished game doesn't look nearly as good as in the gameplay trailer. Well Rip consoles, again no money from me this generation.
Incidentally, I don't find the loading time differences super relevant. 3 seconds +/- with a game that practically no longer loads when you're inside - who carres. In both cases, sit there for 20 seconds and do nothing. Decisive are the games that are loaded more often because you play small, completed levels or similar. - the loading times will be shorter here and the difference will be smaller. Think that is not decisive.
I just can't part with this side😂
Great reply.
A good execution for this user.
For God's sake your naivety has probably taken over 😂.
Love with people. He, GalaxyPhone, represents the naive and above all uneducated community of the Playstation.
I thank the person who reported this question, it saved me some time.
Hello "With people"! 👋
