The PS4 Pro and Xbox One X are sometimes dragged into the dirt. Sure, they do not offer too much added value, but there are also enough people who buy a One X for 330 euro in a bundle, for example, because they have not had a console for this gene so far, want to catch up on all the titles and do not buy any next gen anyway at full price want, also there min. 3 years the current consoles are supported and the One X is relatively future-proof. Apart from the fact that the companies have to make an effort again, see the great hardware advantage of the One X or Exclusives at Sony. Or do I think too limited to the target group?
So
there are several versions of both the x box and the ps4.
With the Ps4 it is the "Pro"
With the X box one X "
The first models can be forgotten, they run at 30 fps and there are many fps dropps and micro stutters. Mainly you choose a console because of the exclusive title, at least that was the case with me. With the new titles that will be released in 2020, only the Pro variant will probably be able to keep up well. The normal version will have a downgrade and also probably how jerky. A Ps4 Pro is already available for 270-290 new.
What is jerky with the first models? ^^ This is due to the developers, whether a lot, little, or not at all jerky. Especially since there are many games that run in 60 fps, even with the first models… Also with the fps drops, that is not because of the console, even games like 'God of War' for the Ps4, runs without stutters and on the Xbox For example, One runs Forza Horizon 4 without any stutters… ^^
"jerky as usual"… The n times rather far-fetched sentence ^^
Well at the consoles the games are lured to 30 fps sherlock. Clearly the developers are responsible for the performance and optimization of the games. However, the exclusive titles like God of war etc. Are made to run well on the Ps4. But that is with the Most Ps4 don't play, which is why the Pro version came out, which keeps 30 Fps constant.
So frankly, I don't understand the meaning of your question, nor the content or context of your text. I just don't understand what you're getting at. This sentence alone, "Or I think too limited to the target group".
What are mid-gen please. Consoles? When we speak of current gen. So the current generation. Before that there was last gen. Us next year probably the next gen. The individual hardware revisions like the One in the form of the One S or One X are not their own generation of consoles because they run the same games as on the normal consoles, i.e. The first variants.
And who, please, pulls the One X or PS4 pro into the dirt? Only technology-loving PC users have nothing left for consoles. But this has always been the case and is not a problem for the current generation of consoles. And what does it mean they don't offer too much added value? A higher resolution, stable or higher frame rates, more details, longer viewing distances plus HDR support are quite an added value in times of 4k HDR TVs. Especially since they are now affordable.
So the target group is still the console-playing Konsolero. Who might want to upgrade to X or Pro to take advantage of the latest TV technology and also want to play the best console version of a game. Or someone who only has the console of one manufacturer and is now choosing the best possible version from the competition.
What a silly statement.
The Pro didn't come out because of a more stable frame rate. As with the ONE X, it was all about the resolution. Since 4k TVs with HDR support are becoming increasingly popular, the first console variants are technically lagging behind. It is understandable that the consoles also donated a little more power.
Otherwise, you contradict each other and your statement is simply wrong.
Quote: at the consoles, the games are lured to 30 fps
is somehow in contradiction to the next one.
Quote: That's why the Pro version came out, which keeps 30 fps constant
What now? Could the consoles previously hold 30 fps because you say that they are lured to the console or can this only be the pro that supposedly came out of it? Where we're at the next problem. Games are not lured to 30Fps on consoles. Where do you get such nonsense from? Numerous games offer a 60 frame mode and the developer only installs a lock if he knows that the frame rate drops significantly. At least if he's smart.
And games don't jerk per se. It is only logical if a complex game is to run on hardware that has meanwhile been exhausted, and there are technical difficulties. But to extend this to all games is simply nonsense.
My God,
Both the normal Ps4 and the Pro variant are lured to 30 fps, which means that they do not exceed this limit! ". But that does not mean that the console does not suffer any fps drops, is called >>>> the normal console >> > also drops below 30 fps. Constant fps> Pro> 30fps. DU Sry can't go into your last point. The idiot always wins the discussion piece and out
Well if so, it would be more helpful to speak of the PS4 instead of generalizing the whole thing as consoles. Because this does not apply to the Xbox.
Point.
I'm happy to return the idiots, although I'm not aware of where this reaction on your part is based.
